<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>TextWise Blog &#187; semantics neuroscience cmu dimension brain imaging primate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.textwise.com/tag/semantics-neuroscience-cmu-dimension-brain-imaging-primate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.textwise.com</link>
	<description>A blog about the SemanticHacker API by TextWise</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 18:50:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>How Many Dimensions Again?</title>
		<link>http://blog.textwise.com/2010/02/25/how-many-dimensions-again/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.textwise.com/2010/02/25/how-many-dimensions-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 13:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clinton Mah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[semantics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[semantics neuroscience cmu dimension brain imaging primate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.textwise.com/?p=302</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We have been thinking lately about how many dimensions a semantic dictionary should have. Some researchers at Carnegie-Mellon have been approaching the same question from the perspective of neuroscience and real-time imaging of activity in the human brain while understanding language (http://bit.ly/buIZEx). According to CMU, there are really only THREE basic semantic dimensions: (1) Can [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.textwise.com%2F2010%2F02%2F25%2Fhow-many-dimensions-again%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.textwise.com%2F2010%2F02%2F25%2Fhow-many-dimensions-again%2F&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>We have been thinking lately about how many dimensions a semantic dictionary should have. Some researchers at Carnegie-Mellon have been approaching the same question from the perspective of neuroscience and real-time imaging of activity in the human brain while understanding language (<a href="http://thetartan.org/2010/2/8/scitech/brainnoun">http://bit.ly/buIZEx</a>).</p>
<p>According to CMU, there are really only THREE basic semantic dimensions: (1) Can I eat it? (2) Can I pick it up? (3) Can I hide in it? Admittedly, this primitive partitioning of the world probably goes back to our primate origins, but does have a certain resonance. Let&#8217;s remember it the next time we try to categorize journal articles in nanotechnology or search postings on someone&#8217;s Facebook wall.</p>
<script type="text/javascript">
  addthis_url    = 'http%3A%2F%2Fblog.textwise.com%2F2010%2F02%2F25%2Fhow-many-dimensions-again%2F';
  addthis_title  = 'How+Many+Dimensions+Again%3F';
  addthis_pub    = '';
</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/addthis_widget.php?v=12" ></script>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.textwise.com/2010/02/25/how-many-dimensions-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

